portal.bend.com
Bend HSA Portal dashboard

Reimagining the Bend HSA Expense Tracker

How can we improve the health expense tracker’s ease of use and functionality, so users can utilize their HSA to its full potential?

Reimagining the Bend HSA Expense Tracker

Client

Bend Financial

FinTech · Health Savings

Role

UX Designer

Category

  • UX Research
  • Interaction Design

Timeline

3-week sprint

Problem

Making HSA Management Easier to Understand

Bend Financial helps members save, invest, and manage healthcare spending through their Health Savings Account (HSA). But the existing experience created friction across onboarding and expense tracking, making it difficult for members to understand their benefits and confidently manage their HSA.

Over a three-week sprint, I worked with two other designers to identify key pain points and redesign the experience using familiar interaction patterns and a clearer information hierarchy. Our goal was to make healthcare expenses easier to understand and manage while helping members get more value from their HSA.

Research

Our Process

  1. 1

    Research

    6 user interviews and a first round of usability testing on the live portal.

    User interviewsUsability testingCompetitive analysis
  2. 2

    Define

    Synthesized findings into personas and a shared set of design focuses.

    Affinity mappingPersonasHeuristic evaluation
  3. 3

    Ideate

    Timed design studio sketching, then merged into one direction as a team.

    Design studioSketchingWireframing
  4. 4

    Prototype

    Built out the redesign using Bend's Atomic Design component library.

    Atomic design systemInvision prototype
  5. 5

    Test

    A second usability round validated the terminology and flow changes.

    Usability testing round 2Iteration

Research

Fieldwork at a glance

0

Screened for Research

0

Passed for Participation

00

Initial Usability Test

00

Redesigned Usability Test

00

User Interviews

The numbers pointed to one root problem: People didn’t trust a portal they didn’t fully understand.

Understanding

The User

User Interviews

Our initial steps were to gather an understanding of users who have a health savings account, and how they interact with it. Through user interviews, we asked our users several questions to gain insight.

01

What are users' current understanding of their HSA?

02

What are users' current expense tracking habits?

03

What, if any, applications users used for tracking finances?

04

What are users' expectations of an HSA administrator such as Bend?

Understanding

The Product

Goals and Features

To better understand the product's objectives and technical constraints, I conducted stakeholder interviews and reviewed existing documentation.

01

The portal needed to support responsive design for various devices (desktop, tablet, mobile).

02

Integration with existing backend systems for real-time data synchronization was crucial.

03

Enhance security measures and compliance with healthcare regulations.

04

Implement new features such as personalized financial insights and educational content.

Affinity Mapping

Affinity map of user research sticky notes grouped into themes

Key User Insights

01

Understanding

  • Not fully aware of all the benefits their HSA offers.
  • Confused by site terminology, including "Unreviewed" and "Unreimbursed."

02

Behavior

  • Budget expenses on a regular cadence — weekly or monthly.
  • Struggle to split and delete expenses in the current flow.

03

Expectations

  • Want more guidance on how to actually use the product.
  • Want a clean portal, not one crowded with distracting elements.

Personas

Persona avatar for a frequent HSA user

Frequent User

Organized and already maximizing their HSA

Behavior

  • Makes regular contributions to HSA out of payroll
  • Uses HSA to invest money and regularly checks investments
  • Has infrequent doctors' appointments
  • Is organized and regularly tracks finances
  • Enrolled in a high deductible insurance plan

Goals

  • Wants to maximize saving opportunity
  • Is utilizing HSA to full potential by keeping track of health expenses
Persona avatar for an infrequent HSA user

Infrequent User

Rarely checks in and needs help getting started

Behavior

  • Has infrequent doctors' appointments
  • Enrolled in a high deductible insurance plan
  • Does not regularly track finances
  • Makes HSA contributions only occasionally prior to expected health expenses
  • Does not check HSA regularly

Goals

  • Needs assistance in managing health expenses
  • Has minimal understanding and open to learning more about the benefits of an HSA
Challenges and Solutions

Competitive Analysis

We faced a challenge in conducting competitive analysis on competing health savings account applications because we were unable to create accounts and log into without a high deductible health insurance plan.

As a solution we studied design patterns for simple task in applications like Google Mail. We worked around the lack of access to finance applications by watching YouTube demos where we pulled best practices relating to health expense tracking and onboarding.

Findings

01

Users want a clean, learnable portal — not more functionality

02

Categorizing and updating expenses needs to be effortless

SWOT Analysis

Strengths

  • Digital Interface
  • Artificial Intelligence Function

Weakness

  • Users not taking advantage of the products full functionalities
  • Lack of flexibility within expense tracking

Opportunity

  • Product redesigns
  • Educating the user for both user needs and business goals

Threats

  • Emerging competition
  • Shifting political and legal landscape

Users didn’t need more features. They needed the ones already there explained in language they trusted.

Collaboration

Current Interface

Define and Ideate

In addition to the issues found while conducting usability tests on the current interface, we familiarized ourselves with the product and conducted our own assessment of the portal as well. Associating our findings from our initial research and our heuristic evaluation, we compounded key focuses for the redesign.

Element Focuses

Onboarding

Add onboarding features to clarify functionalities of the Portal.

Taxonomy

Redefine the taxonomy of the health expense tracker and revise information architecture.

Edit Flow

Update the edit functionalities in the health expense tracker.

Feedback

Include clear feedback and error prevention messages.

Current Bend HSA Portal UI screens

Design

Ideation

Sketching

We conducted a design studio where we picked a section to redesign and set up a clock to 10-15 minutes in order to create design choices and then make decisions on the different options.

Diverge and converge design studio diagram
Studio sketches from the timed design studio

Atomic Design

We were given access to Bend's design library, which was constructed based on the principles of Atomic Design. This system allowed me to redesign Bend's interface with building blocks, i.e. atoms, molecules and organisms.

Atomic Design methodology from atoms to pages

Design System

Bend Design System
Marking Up Wireframes

Iterations

After working individually on our wireframes, we all sat together, compiled our designs, and marked up the ideas we liked and wanted to incorporate in the master. We also determined ideas to just throw out and things to explore more with sketches/wireframes.

Team Collaboration Meeting - Marking Up Wireframes
Key Insights

What the markup session decided

Four calls from the collaborative review shaped what moved into the master wireframes—and what we cut before testing.

Markup decisions

  1. 01

    Taxonomy

    Remove pill tabs and rename sections to match how members think about expenses.

  2. 02

    Repetition

    Keep only repeating patterns that earn their place—cut anything that adds noise.

  3. 03

    Success screen

    Add a clear completion moment after expense review so members know they're done.

  4. 04

    Shopping cart

    Drop the cart-style pattern to keep the expense flow short.

Applied to

Master wireframesUsability round 2

Annotated wireframe iterations across expense tracking screens

Results

Usability Test, Round 2

Testing and Iterations

After redesigning key expense tracking and onboarding moments, we ran a second usability round to pressure-test what still caused hesitation.

Iteration focuses

  1. 01

    Terminology

    Clarify the confusing terms that showed up in round-one testing.

  2. 02

    Ineligible flow

    Make "Mark as Ineligible" explicit with clear feedback before the change sticks.

  3. 03

    Visual cleanup

    Tighten spacing, buttons, and pop-up messaging so the flow feels consistent.

Applied to

Expense reviewOnboarding

Before
Before design
After
After design

We decided to switch the placement of the tabs because the proximity of the higher navigation tabs caused confusion. For the success screen, we added a way to exit the screen because users were pigeon holed into only continuing onto the 'Eligible Expenses' section.

Before
Before design
After
After design

When marking an expense as ineligible in the edit function, originally the color of the button would inverse to indicate the button was 'on'. This caused confusion because the action wasn't clear. We added a confirmation dialog to make the action explicit and prevent accidental changes.

The second round of testing didn’t add features — it replaced ambiguity with one clear action for every expense.

Ideal State Flows

Expenses That Need Review Flow

Pinch or ⌘/Ctrl + scroll to zoom, drag to pan. Use the controls to reset or open full screen.

Interactions

Solution Prototype

The key to good micro-interactions is to make them feel natural and intuitive. This means designing them so that they are not disruptive to the user's workflow but instead provide subtle feedback and guidance.

Onboarding

Bend's artificial intelligence the 'Bend Advisor' will help give users a clear understanding of the portal. When users arrive onto a page for the first time, users will be prompted on the key functions for that particular page.

Prototype animation
Needs Review image

Needs Review-Very Likely Expenses

The Bend Advisor reviews the user's transactions and categorizes them into 'Very Likely', 'Potential' and 'Unlikely' health expenses. On each login, the user is notified of how many health expenses to review and has to mark each as 'Eligible' or 'Ineligible' for reimbursement.

Splitting a Transaction that includes a Health Expense

Expenses that have the potential to be a healthcare expense, are populated in the 'Potential' section. The user is able to edit the expense, split the eligible amount, add a receipt, and mark it eligible for reimbursement.

Splitting a Transaction prototype
Designating a Non-healthcare Transaction prototype

Designating a Non-healthcare Transaction as Always Ineligible

For transactions that will never qualify for HSA reimbursement, users can mark them as always ineligible. This prevents repeat review of the same non-healthcare purchases and keeps the expense tracker focused on items that actually need attention.

Removing an Expense Marked as Eligible for Reimbursement

Mistakes will happen and users need a way to undo any actions that they have taken. In this case, an expense was marked as eligible but it is in-fact ineligible and needs to be removed. The user can edit the transaction and in 2 steps remove the transaction from the 'Expenses ready for reimbursement' list.

Removing an Expense prototype
Selecting Expenses for Reimbursement prototype

Selecting Expenses for Reimbursement

When the user is ready to be reimbursed, they are able to select specific transactions and designate which account the money will go to using the drop-down menu. Once the action is complete, the user receives a confirmation screen.

Designing within an existing product

This project reinforced that improving an existing product means working within the systems and constraints already in place. Designing within Bend's Atomic Design System required us to balance new ideas with established patterns, while close collaboration with developers helped ensure the experience could translate cleanly from design to implementation.

The limited project timeline also meant making intentional decisions about where to focus our research and what to validate next. With more time, I would continue testing the experience with Bend members and use those findings to refine onboarding, education, and key account workflows.

Next Steps

  1. 01

    Validate with Members

    Research

    Test the redesigned experience with Bend members to validate the navigation, terminology, and expense-tracking workflows.

  2. 02

    Strengthen Onboarding & Education

    Experience Strategy

    Explore how onboarding and contextual guidance could help first-time members better understand and use their HSA.

  3. 03

    Refine Key Account Workflows

    Interaction Design

    Continue improving the dashboard and expense-management experience based on member feedback.

Next project: Designing Impact Capstone

VIEW NEXT PROJECT